华西口腔医学杂志

• 基础研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

铸钛的不同表面处理对钛-聚合瓷结合强度影响的实验研究

刘杰1  范金杰2  谷晓明2  曲立杰3  王健平4   

  1. 1.青岛大学医学院附属医院  口腔修复科, 青岛 266003; 2.哈尔滨真明口腔医院 修复科, 哈尔滨 150076; 3.佳木斯大学  材料学院; 4.佳木斯大学附属口腔医院 牙体牙髓病科, 佳木斯 154002
  • 出版日期:2013-02-01 发布日期:2013-02-01
  • 通讯作者: 王健平,Tel:0454-8625553
  • 作者简介:刘杰(1963—),女,黑龙江人,副主任医师,博士
  • 基金资助:

    黑龙江省海外学人基金资助项目(1155h021);佳木斯大 学科研基金资助项目(s2009-045)

Effect of different surface treatments on bonding strength of composite resin to commercially pure titanium

Liu Jie1, Fan Jinjie2, Gu Xiaoming2, Qu Lijie3, Wang Jianping4   

  1. 1. Dept. of Prosthodontics, The Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, China; 2. Dept. of Prosthodontics, Zhenming Dental Hospital of Harbin, Harbin 150076, China; 3. Materials College, Jiamusi University, Jiamusi 154002, China; 4. Dept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, The Affiliated Stomatology Hospital, Jiamusi University, Jiamusi 154002, China
  • Online:2013-02-01 Published:2013-02-01

摘要:

目的  研究铸钛的不同表面处理方法对钛-聚合瓷结合强度的影响。方法 将24个铸钛试件随机分为光 滑组、粗糙组、酸蚀光滑组和酸蚀粗糙组,每组6个。根据分组不同分别采用不同的表面处理方式,粗糙组进行喷 砂处理,酸蚀光滑组进行酸蚀处理,酸蚀粗糙组喷砂后进行酸蚀,光滑组表面不做处理。表面处理后的钛试件与 聚合瓷制备成钛-聚合瓷试件,测试其剪切结合强度,并在扫描电镜下观察钛表面形貌和剪切试验后钛与聚合瓷断 裂面的形貌。结果 光滑组、粗糙组、酸蚀光滑组和酸蚀粗糙组的剪切结合强度分别为(3.08±0.45)、(6.05±0.74)、(6.27±0.80)、(10.16±0.82)MPa。粗糙组、酸蚀光滑组和酸蚀粗糙组的剪切结合强度高于光滑组(P<0.01),其中酸 蚀粗糙组的剪切结合强度最高,粗糙组和酸蚀光滑组间的剪切结合强度无统计学差异(P>0.05)。各组的钛表面形
貌和剪切试验后钛与聚合瓷断裂面的形貌均有一定的差异。结论 钛表面酸蚀处理和喷砂处理可提高钛-聚合瓷的剪切结合强度,喷砂后酸蚀处理是一种有效地提高钛-聚合瓷剪切结合强度的表面处理方法。

关键词: 钛, 聚合瓷, 表面处理, 结合强度

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the effectiveness of different surface treatments that could promote the bond strength of composite resin to commercially pure titanium. Methods The 24 casting pure titanium specimen were randomly divided into four groups: Smooth group, rough group, acid etching smooth group, acid etching rough group. Each group had six specimens. In the different groups, the specimens were treated respectively under different surface treatments. The specimens of rough group was sandblasted, the acid etching smooth group was treated by acid etching, the acid etching rough group was treated by acid etching after sandblasting, the smooth group had no treat- ment. After surface treatment, the casting pure titanium specimens that were veneered by composite resin became titanium-composite resin specimen. Then the bond strengths were evaluated by universal testing machine and the surfaces were observed by scanning electron microscope including titanium surface appearance and titanium surface ap- pearance of different groups after shear test. Results The bond strengths of smooth group, rough group, acid etching smooth group, acid etching rough group were (3.08±0.45), (6.05±0.74), (6.27±0.80), (10.16±0.82)MPa, respectively. The statistical analysis showed that the bond strengths in rough group, acid etching smooth group, acid etching rough group were higher than in smooth group(P<0.01). The highest bond strength was the acid etching rough group. There were no significant differences in the bond strength between rough group and acid etching smooth group(P >0.05). There were some different titanium surface appearances in each group before and after testing. Conclusion Titanium surface treatment of sandblasting and etching can improve the bond strength between titanium and composite resin.
The pre-treatment of sandblasting before etching is an effective modification method of titanium for bonding to composite resin.

Key words:  titanium, composite resin, surface treatment, bond strength