10种复合树脂颜色稳定性与吸水溶解性研究

doi:10.7518/hxkq.2023.01.008

华西口腔医学杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 58-66.doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2023.01.008

10种复合树脂颜色稳定性与吸水溶解性研究

罗文佶¹(), 黄文凯¹^,², 徐明华¹, 任玲¹, 程玉瑶¹, 战德松³, 付佳乐³()

^1.中国医科大学口腔医学院，沈阳 110002
^2.中国医科大学附属口腔医院正畸二科，沈阳 110002
^3.中国医科大学口腔医学院口腔材料学教研室，中国医科大学附属口腔医院修复二科，沈阳 110002

收稿日期:2022-07-10 修回日期:2022-08-25 出版日期:2023-02-01 发布日期:2023-02-21
通讯作者: 付佳乐 E-mail:luowinky@163.com;fullers@126.com
作者简介:罗文佶，学士，E-mail：luowinky@163.com
基金资助:
中国医科大学大学生创新创业训练计划(X20221015-9078)

The color stability, water sorption, and solubility of ten composite resins

Luo Wenji¹(), Huang Wenkai¹^,², Xu Minghua¹, Ren Ling¹, Cheng Yuyao¹, Zhan Desong³, Fu Jiale³()

^1.School of Stomatology, China Medical University, Shenyang 110002, China
^2.The Second Department of Orthodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, China Medical University, Shenyang 110002, China
^3.Dept. of Dental Materials; The Second Department of Prosthetics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, China Medical University, Shenyang 110002, China

Received:2022-07-10 Revised:2022-08-25 Online:2023-02-01 Published:2023-02-21
Contact: Fu Jiale E-mail:luowinky@163.com;fullers@126.com
Supported by:
Undergraduate Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program of China Medical University(X202210159078)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的评价10种光固化复合树脂在不同溶液中的颜色稳定性及吸水溶解性能。方法 10种光固化复合树脂分别为：BeautifilⅡ（B2）、Ceram. X One Universal（CXU）、Charisma（CS）、Charisma Diamond（CD）、Denfil（DF）、DX. Universal（DXU）、Filtek Z250（Z250）、Filtek Z350 XT（Z350）、FS-1（FS）、Magnafill Putty（MP）。每种树脂材料各制作20个试件，随机分为4组（n=5），分别浸入蒸馏水（对照组）、咖喱、咖啡和红酒28 d，分光光度计测量试件浸入前及浸入后1、7、14、21和28 d的色度值（CIE L∗a∗b∗），计算染色前后色差值。根据ISO 4049: 2019标准，每种材料制作3个试件，测量材料的吸水性和溶解性。采用三因素方差分析评估树脂材料、染液、染色时间对染色前后色差值（ΔE）的影响，采用单因素方差分析比较不同材料的吸水值和溶解值变化。结果随着染色时间增加，所有试件均出现一定程度的颜色变化。树脂材料类型、染液类型、染色时间以及三者的交互作用对ΔE的影响均具有统计学意义（P<0.001）。所测材料任一时间点颜色变化：咖喱>红酒>咖啡>蒸馏水。浸入咖喱、咖啡、红酒7 d后所有材料均出现临床不可接受的变色（ΔE>3.3）。浸入咖喱28 d后，CS的ΔE最小，DXU的ΔE最大；浸入咖啡28 d后，FS的ΔE最小，DXU的ΔE最大；浸入红酒28 d后，FS的ΔE最小，Z350的ΔE最大。MP与CXU在所有溶液中的色差值均较小。Z350吸水值最高，MP吸水值最低；CS和CD的溶解值高于其他材料。结论光固化复合树脂的颜色稳定性具有材料依赖性，并受色素种类、浸泡时间的影响；MP与CXU的颜色稳定性较好；MP的吸水性和溶解性较低。

关键词: 复合树脂, 颜色稳定性, 吸水性, 溶解性

Abstract:

Objective This study aims to evaluate the color stability and related properties including water sorption and solubility of ten light-cured composite resins in different solutions. Methods A total of 10 composite resins were BeautifilⅡ(B2) and Ceram. X One Universal (CXU), Charisma (CS), Charisma Diamond (CD), Denfil (DF), DX. Universal (DXU), Filtek Z250 (Z250), Filtek Z350 XT (Z350), FS-1 (FS), and Magnafill Putty (MP). Meanwhile, a total of 20 disk-shaped samples were fabricated and randomly divided into four groups (n=5), which were immersed in distilled water (control group), curry, coffee, and red wine for 28 days. The color (CIE L∗a∗b∗) was measured by a spectrophotometer at baseline and 1, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after immersion, and the color differences were calculated. Water sorption and solubility values were measured ba-sed on ISO 4049: 2019. In addition, three-way ANOVA was used to evaluate the influence of resin materials, solutions, and immersion time on discoloration results, meanwhile, one-way ANOVA was used to compare the water sorption values and solubility values of different materials. Results All samples showed a certain degree of color change with time. Color differences were significantly influenced by materials, solutions, and immersion time (P<0.001). The color changes of the measured materials at any time point: curry>red wine>coffee>distilled water. Thus, all materials showed clinically unacceptable discoloration (ΔE>3.3) after immersing in staining curry, coffee, and red wine for 7 days. Therefore, when immersed in curry for 28 days, CS and DXU had the smallest and the largest color difference. In addition, when immersed in coffee for 28 days, FS showed the smallest color change and DXU showed the largest. Moreover, when immersed in red wine for 28 days, FS showed the smallest color change and Z350 showed the largest. Furthermore, MP and CXU had small color differences in all solutions. Meanwhile, Z350 had the highest water sorption and MP had the lowest. The solubility values of CS and CD were significantly higher than those of other materials. Conclusion The color stability of light-cured composite resin is materials-depended and affected by pigment types and immersion time. Thus, MP and CXU have better color stability. MP has low water sorption.

Key words: composite resin, color stability, water sorption, solubility

中图分类号:

R 783.1

罗文佶, 黄文凯, 徐明华, 任玲, 程玉瑶, 战德松, 付佳乐. 10种复合树脂颜色稳定性与吸水溶解性研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2023, 41(1): 58-66.

Luo Wenji, Huang Wenkai, Xu Minghua, Ren Ling, Cheng Yuyao, Zhan Desong, Fu Jiale. The color stability, water sorption, and solubility of ten composite resins[J]. West China Journal of Stomatology, 2023, 41(1): 58-66.

图/表 10

表 1

表 2

表 3

表 4

表 5

表 6

图 1

图 2

图 3

表 7

参考文献 23

1	Baldissera RA, Corrêa MB, Schuch HS, et al. Are there universal restorative composites for anterior and posterior teeth[J]. J Dent, 2013, 41(11): 1027-1035.
2	Lynch CD, Opdam NJ, Hickel R, et al. Guidance on posterior resin composites: Academy of Operative Dentistry-European Section[J]. J Dent, 2014, 42(4): 377-383.
3	Demarco FF, Collares K, Coelho-de-Souza FH, et al. Anterior composite restorations: a systematic review on long-term survival and reasons for failure[J]. Dent Mater, 2015, 31(10): 1214-1224.
4	Araujo E, Perdigão J. Anterior veneer restorations—an evidence-based minimal-intervention perspective[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2021, 23(2): 91-110.
5	Manojlovic D, Dramićanin MD, Lezaja M, et al. Effect of resin and photoinitiator on color, translucency and co-lor stability of conventional and low-shrinkage model composites[J]. Dent Mater, 2016, 32(2): 183-191.
6	Morais Sampaio GA, Rangel Peixoto L, Vasconcelos Neves G, et al. Effect of mouthwashes on color stability of composite resins: a systematic review[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2021, 126(3): 386-392.
7	Alshali RZ, Salim NA, Satterthwaite JD, et al. Long-term sorption and solubility of bulk-fill and conventio-nal resin-composites in water and artificial saliva[J]. J Dent, 2015, 43(12): 1511-1518.
8	Alqahtani S, Abusaq A, Alghamdi M, et al. Colour stabi-lity of resin infiltrated white spot lesion after exposure to stain-causing drinks[J]. Saudi J Biol Sci, 2022, 29(2): 1079-1084.
9	Schneider LFJ, Ribeiro RB, Liberato WF, et al. Curing potential and color stability of different resin-based lu- ting materials[J]. Dent Mater, 2020, 36(10): e309-e315.
10	Liebermann A, Vehling D, Eichberger M, et al. Impact of storage media and temperature on color stability of tooth-colored CAD/CAM materials for final restorations[J]. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater, 2019, 17(4): 22808-00019836832.
11	Schroeder T, da Silva PB, Basso GR, et al. Factors affecting the color stability and staining of esthetic restorations[J]. Odontology, 2019, 107(4): 507-512.
12	Shin JW, Kim JE, Choi YJ, et al. Evaluation of the color stability of 3D-printed crown and bridge materials a-gainst various sources of discoloration: an in vitro study[J]. Materials (Basel), 2020, 13(23): E5359.
13	Ghinea R, Pérez MM, Herrera LJ, et al. Color difference thresholds in dental ceramics[J]. J Dent, 2010, 38(): e57-e64.
14	Mara da Silva T, Barbosa Dantas DC, Franco TT, et al. Surface degradation of composite resins under staining and brushing challenges[J]. J Dent Sci, 2019, 14(1): 87-92.
15	Kawaguchi M, Fukushima T, Horibe T. Effect of monomer structure on the mechanical properties of light-cured unfilled resins[J]. Dent Mater J, 1988, 7(2): 174-181.
16	Rusnac ME, Prodan D, Cuc S, et al. Water sorption and solubility of flowable giomers[J]. Materials (Basel), 2021, 14(9): 2399.
17	Paravina RD, Roeder L, Lu H, et al. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness, gloss and color of resin-based composites[J]. Am J Dent, 2004, 17(4): 262-266.
18	Awad D, Stawarczyk B, Liebermann A, et al. Translucency of esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials and composite resins with respect to thickness and surface roughness[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2015, 113(6): 534-540.
19	Santos C, Clarke RL, Braden M, et al. Water absorption characteristics of dental composites incorporating hydroxyapatite filler[J]. Biomaterials, 2002, 23(8): 1897-1904.
20	Sideridou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G. Study of water sorption, solubility and modulus of elasticity of light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins[J]. Biomaterials, 2003, 24(4): 655-665.
21	Sideridou I, Achilias DS, Spyroudi C, et al. Water sorption characteristics of light-cured dental resins and composites based on Bis-EMA/PCDMA[J]. Biomaterials, 2004, 25(2): 367-376.
22	Hibino Y, Nagasawa Y, Eda Y, et al. Effect of storage conditions on mechanical properties of resin composite blanks for CAD/CAM crowns[J]. Dent Mater J, 2020, 39(5): 742-751.
23	Ban S, Sato H, Suehiro Y, et al. Biaxial flexure strength and low temperature degradation of Ce-TZP/Al2O3 na-nocomposite and Y-TZP as dental restoratives[J]. J Bio-med Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2008, 87(2): 492-498.

名称（缩写）	树脂单体	无机填料及尺寸	填料载量	厂商（批号）
Beautifil Ⅱ （B2）	Bis-GMA，TEGDMA	碳氟化铝硅酸盐玻璃，氧化铝，二氧化硅，微粒子硅酸（0.01~4 μm）	83.3 wt%/68.6 vol%	Shofu公司，日本（072083）
Ceram. X One Universal （CXU）	Bis-EMA，TEGDMA，甲基丙烯酸酯改性的聚硅氧烷，聚氨酯甲基丙烯酸酯	纳米填料（10 nm），有机改性的纳米陶瓷颗粒（2~3 nm），钡玻璃（1~1.5 μm），氟化镱	77~79 wt%/59~61 vol%	Densply公司，德国（2103001285）
Charisma （CS）	Bis-GMA，TEGDMA	钡铝玻璃（0.02~2 μm），二氧化硅（0.02~0.07 μm）	78 wt%/58 vol%	Heracus Kulzer公司，德国（71206）
Charisma Diamond （CD）	TCD-DI-HEA，UDMA， Bis-GMA，TEGDMA	钡铝氟化玻璃，二氧化硅（5 nm~20 μm）	81 wt%/64 vol%	Heracus Kulzer公司，德国（K010054）
Denfil （DF）	Bis-GMA，TEGDMA	铝矽酸钡（≤1 μm），锻制二氧化硅	80 wt%	Vericom公司，韩国（DF1376A1）
DX. Universal （DXU）	THFA，Bis-GMA，UDMA	含锶玻璃，硅填料（0.03~5 μm）	71 vol%	吉林省登泰克牙科材料有限公司（BJBJAE）
Filtek Z250 （Z250）	Bis-GMA，UDMA，Bis-EMA	氧化锆/硅填料（无硅偶联剂处理）（0.01~3.5 μm）	82 wt%/60 vol%	3M EPSE公司，美国（NA53941）
Filtek Z350 XT （Z350）	Bis-GMA，UDMA，TEGDMA，Bis-EMA	硅填料（20 nm），氧化锆填料（4~11 nm），硅/氧化锆填料（0.6~10 μm）	78.5 wt%/63.3 vol%	3M EPSE公司，美国（NA53296）
FS-1 （FS）	UDMA，TEGDMA	玻璃粉（≤3 μm）	71~75 wt%	上海二医张江生物材料有限公司（-）
Magnafill Putty （MP）	Bis-MEPP，UDMA	含钡玻璃	76~84 wt%/50~56 vol%	GC公司，日本（2108231）

源	Ⅲ类平方和	自由度	均方	F值	P值
材料类型	29 497.026	9	3 277.447	5 373.548	<0.001
染液类型	1 199 711.820	3	399 903.939	655 663.673	<0.001
染色时间	22 530.994	4	5 632.748	9 235.189	<0.001
染色时间×材料类型	1 619.344	36	44.982	73.750	<0.001
染色时间×染液类型	6 705.029	12	558.752	916.104	<0.001
材料类型×染液类型	25 183.241	27	932.713	1 529.232	<0.001
染色时间×树脂材料×染液类型	2 353.824	108	21.795	35.734	<0.001

材料	咖喱
材料	ΔE₁	ΔE₂	ΔE₃	ΔE₄	ΔE₅
B2	48.37±1.77^a	52.71±1.36^b	53.46±1.53^b	55.29±1.07^c	56.08±1.41^c
CXU	42.43±0.84^a	49.93±0.59^b	51.16±1.47^b	54.36±0.65^c	55.86±0.58^d
CS	45.44±2.60^a	48.92±0.72^b	50.46±0.85^c	53.77±0.63^d	53.99±0.70^d
CD	50.05±1.73^a	52.91±0.55^b	55.16±1.57^c	57.75±0.93^d	58.10±0.77^d
DF	49.03±0.89^a	54.93±0.34^b	55.44±1.07^b	58.41±0.55^c	59.09±0.68^d
DXU	48.55±1.14^a	60.14±0.62^b	61.84±1.34^c	65.09±0.67^d	65.18±0.72^d
Z250	48.63±0.78^a	51.69±2.44^b	53.43±1.97^b	56.66±2.57^c	57.29±2.33^c
Z350	51.40±0.72^a	56.79±2.39^b	57.60±2.55^b	61.08±3.21^c	61.61±3.04^c
FS	52.67±0.73^a	55.56±0.97^b	57.53±0.81^c	59.18±0.98^d	60.46±0.96^e
MP	44.64±0.94^a	49.20±0.88^b	52.88±1.09^c	56.82±0.96^d	57.13±1.21^d

材料	咖啡
材料	ΔE₁	ΔE₂	ΔE₃	ΔE₄	ΔE₅
B2	10.65±1.32^a	14.8±1.56^b	15.49±1.27^b	18.69±1.26^c	20.13±1.17^d
CXU	4.06±0.65^a	9.19±0.68^b	9.33±0.62^b	11.91±0.54^c	11.80±0.60^c
CS	6.47±1.37^a	11.41±0.71^b	12.26±0.85^c	15.85±0.82^d	15.09±0.54^e
CD	6.62±0.82^a	13.49±0.75^b	13.44±0.84^b	15.78±0.88^c	16.82±0.85^d
DF	5.34±0.76^a	9.15±1.02^b	11.01±0.84^c	12.01±1.25^d	12.64±1.33^d
DXU	11.96±1.55^a	18.81±1.45^b	20.39±1.09^c	23.04±1.32^d	24.79±1.11^e
Z250	6.05±1.22^a	12.09±0.42^b	12.49±0.46^c	14.63±0.51^d	15.45±0.77^e
Z350	10.95±0.57^a	16.21±1.37^b	17.47±1.01^c	21.02±0.97^d	21.03±1.00^d
FS	1.57±0.39^a	3.79±0.40^b	4.68±0.55^c	6.01±0.43^d	6.06±0.75^d
MP	4.30±0.40^a	8.13±0.63^b	8.62±0.62^b	11.21±0.72^c	12.64±0.94^d

材料	红酒
材料	ΔE₁	ΔE₂	ΔE₃	ΔE₄	ΔE₅
B2	13.88±1.45^a	19.69±1.16^b	21.88±0.95^c	25.69±1.29^d	26.51±0.74^d
CXU	6.13±0.62^a	10.39±0.37^b	11.08±0.78^c	13.68±0.66^d	13.45±0.52^d
CS	13.51±0.77^a	16.35±1.10^b	16.69±0.90^b	19.32±0.93^c	19.74±0.77^c
CD	11.48±0.90^a	18.02±0.49^b	17.74±0.74^b	20.09±0.64^c	19.96±0.66^c
DF	9.57±0.69^a	15.17±0.48^b	15.71±0.56^c	19.09±0.55^d	18.98±0.47^d
DXU	16.61±0.97^a	28.35±0.98^b	31.33±0.72^c	35.39±1.08^d	36.10±1.33^d
Z250	8.55±1.03^a	15.35±1.18^b	16.97±0.59^c	21.02±0.69^d	21.62±0.93^d
Z350	17.26±0.87^a	26.75±1.02^b	29.74±1.13^c	35.67±1.07^d	37.57±1.06^e
FS	4.52±0.59^a	7.46±1.10^b	8.36±0.89^c	11.05±0.80^d	10.58±0.80^d
MP	5.47±0.48^a	9.02±0.40^b	11.39±0.76^c	13.58±0.43^d	15.55±0.36^e

10种复合树脂颜色稳定性与吸水溶解性研究

The color stability, water sorption, and solubility of ten composite resins

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 23

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

材料	吸水值	溶解值
B2	23.76±0.19^a	0.91±0.48^ab
CXU	16.41±0.25^b	0.22±0.18^a
CS	21.44±0.23^d	7.34±1.92^c
CD	20.82±0.34^d	5.55±0.57^c
DF	19.18±0.27^e	1.16±0.36^ab
DXU	17.09±0.12^bc	1.11±0.44^ab
Z250	18.00±0.28^c	0.76±0.20^ab
Z350	32.12±0.55^f	2.80±0.37^b
FS	21.01±0.14^d	1.84±0.21^ab
MP	14.09±0.22^g	0.38±0.17^ab

[1]	薛晶. 大块充填树脂的临床应用影响因素[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2020, 38(3): 233-239.
[2]	薛晶, 杨壁娜. 复合树脂预热的研究现状和临床应用[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2019, 37(6): 571-576.
[3]	张润荃,李大军,赵晓一. 渗透树脂与前牙美学树脂颜色稳定性的比较研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2019, 37(3): 270-274.
[4]	刘清,杨玉琼,聂蓉蓉,孟翔峰. 牙本质玷污层特性对自粘接树脂水门汀粘接强度的影响[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2018, 36(6): 619-622.
[5]	吴峻岭,李彤,高旭,张强,刘迪,葛建华,周传健. 水中浸泡对自修复抗菌复合树脂性能影响的实验研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2018, 36(5): 521-527.
[6]	王如意, 赵志河, 李宇. 正畸用热压膜材料现状与展望[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2018, 36(1): 87-91.
[7]	吴峻岭,张强,孙睿男,朱婷,葛建华,周传健. 含长链烷基季铵盐纳米抗菌无机填料的复合树脂对人牙菌斑生物膜的影响[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2015, 33(6): 565-569.
[8]	陈智陈彬文. 根管治疗后牙体修复的治疗方案选择[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2015, 33(2): 115-120.
[9]	王立凯刘亚男郑焱李萍萍. 人工老化对不同厚度瓷聚体及不同类型树脂黏固材料颜色稳定性的影响[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2015, 33(2): 201-205.
[10]	吴峻岭周凯运朱婷周传健. 含长链烷基季铵盐的纳米抗菌无机填料的合成及其在牙科复合树脂中的应用研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2014, 32(5): 513-518.
[11]	刘杰吴皓孟凡玉宋春花. 3种偶联剂对铸造纯钛与硬质复合树脂结合强度的影响[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2014, 32(3): 225-228.
[12]	吴峻岭1 金婵媛1 聂晓萌1 周凯运2 周传建2. 新型纳米抗菌无机填料的合成及其抗菌性能的初步研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2012, 30(5): 526-529.
[13]	赵奇吴艳. 光固化树脂分层充填技术的应用现状[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2012, 30(4): 335-337.
[14]	张文云袁艳波陈庆华肖玉鸿李星星. 纳米二氧化硅含量对硼酸铝晶须-二氧化硅熔附体填料复合树脂弯曲性能的影响[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2011, 29(02): 195-198.
[15]	刘妍. 高强度玻璃纤维舌侧固定保持器的应用研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2010, 28(03): 290-293.

材料	蒸馏水
材料	ΔE₁	ΔE₂	ΔE₃	ΔE₄	ΔE₅
B2	0.87±0.07^a	0.89±0.14^a	1.25±0.18^b	1.32±0.19^b	2.17±0.18^c
CXU	1.23±0.13^a	1.49±0.23^ab	1.94±0.26^bc	1.71±0.30^c	2.50±0.34^d
CS	0.91±0.18^a	0.95±0.11^a	1.23±0.23^b	1.40±0.13^bc	1.59±0.28^c
CD	1.03±0.15^a	1.04±0.15^a	1.39±0.15^b	1.48±0.14^b	1.99±0.22^c
DF	1.34±0.24^a	2.90±0.54^b	3.19±0.46^b	3.07±0.52^b	3.16±0.59^b
DXU	1.09±0.23^a	1.40±0.29^b	1.53±0.17^b	1.64±0.21^b	1.53±0.23^b
Z250	1.37±0.33^a	2.19±0.51^b	2.13±0.26^bc	1.84±0.28^bc	2.51±0.20^c
Z350	1.00±0.11^a	0.79±0.12^b	1.28±0.18^b	1.05±0.17^c	1.59±0.17^d
FS	2.05±0.20^a	1.44±0.22^a	2.23±0.27^b	1.44±0.23^b	2.21±0.28^b
MP	0.96±0.27^a	0.87±0.20^a	1.40±0.33^b	2.10±0.56^c	2.19±0.32^c