华西口腔医学杂志

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

牙种植临床随机对照试验的报告质量评价

杨树亮1 谢乙加2 欧国敏1   

  1. 1.口腔疾病研究国家重点实验室 华西口腔医院种植科(四川大学);2.正畸科,成都 610041
  • 出版日期:2014-10-01 发布日期:2014-10-01
  • 通讯作者: 欧国敏,教授,博士,E-mail:guominou66@yahoo.com
  • 作者简介:杨树亮,硕士,E-mail:452838861@qq.com

Quality assessment of randomized controlled trials related to dental implant

Yang Shuliang1, Xie Yijia2, Ou Guomin1.   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Dept. of Dental Implantion, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Dept. of Orthodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Online:2014-10-01 Published:2014-10-01

摘要:

目的 应用改良Jadad评分标准和CONSORT(2010)声明评价2000—2012年发表的我国牙种植领域的随机对照试验(RCT),了解我国牙种植临床试验报告质量的现状。方法 计算机检索中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、维普中文科技期刊数据库(VIP)和中国期刊全文数据库(CNKI),外文数据库PubMed和EMBASE,同时配合手工检索2000—2012年我国19种口腔医学期刊,纳入牙种植领域的RCT。采用CONSORT(2010)和改良Jadad评分量表对纳入文献进行报告质量评价。结果 共纳入28篇相关RCT,其报告质量普遍不高,改良Jadad平均评分仅为(1.29±0.71)分,CONSORT(2010)的平均得分仅为(9.75±3.60)分。结论 目前我国牙种植领域的随机对照试验方法学质量普遍较低,报告质量也尚有一定差距。

关键词: 牙种植, 临床试验报告统一标准, 随机对照试验, 文献质量评价

Abstract:

Objective To assess the quality of reporting by randomized controlled trial (RCT) related to dental implants in China during 2000 to 2012 by using the revised Jadad scale and consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT 2010)statement. Methods The following electronic databases were searched: Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, PubMed, and EMBASE. A total of 19 journals of stomatology in China were also searched manually. The qualities of RCT with dental implant published between 2000 and 2012 were assessed using CONSORT(2010)statement and revised Jadad scale. Results Twenty-eight RCTs related to dental implants were identified. The quality of reporting in 28 articles was low. The mean revised Jadad score was 1.29±0.71 and the CONSORT(2010)score was 9.75±3.60. Conclusion The methodological qualities of the included studies on dental implants are generally low, and reporting quality remain unsatisfactory.

Key words: dental implant, consolidated standards of reporting trials, randomized controlled trials, quality evaluation