华西口腔医学杂志

• 基础研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

动态载荷下种植体位置和直径对悬臂梁种植固定义齿应力影响的三维有限元研究

吕佳1,2 刘翠玲3 蓝菁1,2 高旭1,2   

  1. 1.山东大学口腔医院修复科;2.山东省口腔生物医学重点实验室;3.山东大学齐鲁医院口腔科,济南 250012
  • 出版日期:2013-12-01 发布日期:2013-12-01
  • 通讯作者: 高旭,Tel:0531-88382853
  • 作者简介:吕佳(1987—),女,山东人,硕士

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of the location and diameter of implants on the stress distribu-tion in three-unit implant-supported posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures under dynamic loads

Lü Jia1,2, Liu Cuiling3, Lan Jing1,2, Gao Xu1,2.   

  1. 1. Dept. of Prosthodontics, Stomatological Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China; 2. Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine, Jinan 250012, China; 3. Dept. of Stomatology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China
  • Online:2013-12-01 Published:2013-12-01

摘要:

目的 应用三维有限元法分析动态加载下种植体植入位置和直径对悬臂梁种植固定义齿应力的影响。方法 建立左下颌第二前磨牙、第一磨牙、第二磨牙缺失种植固定义齿的三维有限元模型,远中种植体的位置和直径保持不变;近中种植体依次向远中移动形成中轴与第一前磨牙远中面距离D分别为5.5、8.0、10.5、13.0 mm的悬臂梁种植固定义齿,分别采用4.1和4.8 mm两种直径的种植体;以250 N 牙合力模拟咀嚼周期0.875 s的动态载荷加载于颊尖和舌尖上,应用有限元分析软件MSC.Marc和Partran分析种植体—骨组织界面的Von Mises应力情况。结果 随着近中种植体逐渐向远中移动,近远中种植体Von Mises应力均有不同程度增高,近中种植体中轴与第一前磨牙远中面距离D≤8.0 mm范围内种植体最大Von Mises应力增幅缓和,D>8.0 mm时应力急剧加大;近中种植体直径增大,则近远中种植体的应力减小;各加载阶段最大Von Mises应力均处于近远中种植体颈部与皮质骨交界处;斜向加载种植体应力显著大于垂直加载。结论 种植体植入位置是影响悬臂梁种植固定义齿应力的重要因素,悬臂梁长度不超过前磨牙宽度时行种植固定义齿设计是可行的,直径的选择要考虑骨量和悬臂梁长度双重因素。

关键词: 种植固定义齿, 悬臂梁, 动态载荷, 有限元分析

Abstract:

Objective To examine the effect of the location and diameter of implants on stress distribution in three-unit implant-supported posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures (FPD) in the mandible. Methods A three-dimensional finite element model was developed to represent a rigid implant-supported posterior FPD that restores the second left premolar, first molar, and second molar. The location of the distal implant with a diameter of 4.8 mm remained the same, whereas the mesial implants with diameters of 4.1 and 4.8 mm were successively moved toward the posterior area with distances of 5.5, 8.0, 10.5, and 13.0 mm from the long axis of the mesial implants to the first premolar to form the cantilever FPD. Dynamic loads of 250 N were applied from different directions on the buccal and lingual cusps of the FPD to simulate the masticatory cycle for 0.875 s. The maximum Von Mises stresses were calculated using the finite element analysis software MSC. Marc and Partran. Results The maximum Von Mises stresses of the mesial and distal implants increased to some extent as the me-sial implants moved toward the posterior area. Significant increases in the maximum Von Mises stresses were obtained when the mesial implants were located more than 8.0 mm posterior to the first premolar, and moderate increases in the stresses were observed when the mesial implants were located less than 8.0 mm posterior to the first premolar. The use of a broader implant reduced the stress on the interface between the bone and the implants. The maximum Von Mises stresses were found in the cervical region of the cortical bone adjacent to the mesial or the distal implants during stages Ⅱ to Ⅳ of the masticatory cycle. Off-axial loading induced more stresses compared with vertical loading. Conclusion The location of implants in three-unit implant-supported posterior cantilever FPD is a significant factor that influences the stress generated in the interface between the bone and the implants. An implant-supported cantilever FPD is a feasible option for restoring missing teeth when the length of the cantilever is not greater than the width of a premolar. Two important factors should be considered before choosing the implant diameter, namely, bone volume and cantilever length.

Key words: implant-supported fixed partial denture, cantilever, dynamic loads, finite element analysis