华西口腔医学杂志

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

Er:YAG激光切除牙根断面的扫描电镜观察

赵晓一1 王世明1 张成飞2   

  1. 1.北京大学口腔医院综合科, 北京100081; 2.香港大学牙医学院综合牙科, 香港
  • 收稿日期:2010-10-25 修回日期:2010-10-25 出版日期:2010-10-20 发布日期:2010-10-20
  • 通讯作者: 赵晓一,Tel:010-62179977-2586
  • 作者简介:赵晓一(1976—),女,吉林人,主治医师,硕士

Root resection by Er:YAG laser: A scanning electron microscope study

ZHAO Xiao-yi1, WANG Shi-ming1, ZHANG Cheng-fei2   

  1. 1. Dept. of General Therapy, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China; 2. Comprehensive Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
  • Received:2010-10-25 Revised:2010-10-25 Online:2010-10-20 Published:2010-10-20
  • Contact: ZHAO Xiao-yi,Tel:010-62179977-2586

摘要:

目的对Er:YAG激光切除的牙根断面进行扫描电镜研究,并通过对比超声金刚砂尖以及高速涡轮金刚砂车针切除牙根断面的不同表面状态,为Er:YAG激光应用于临床根尖切除术提供依据。方法将30颗上颌中切牙随机分为3组(Er:YAG激光切除组、超声金刚砂尖切除组、高速涡轮金刚砂车针切除组),分别使用Er:YAG激光、超声金刚砂尖以及高速涡轮金刚砂车针在距离根尖3 mm处进行牙根切除。使用扫描电镜观察3组牙根断面残屑及玷污层、牙本质小管开放、裂隙以及器械切割痕迹情况。结果Er:YAG激光切除组和超声金刚砂尖切除组牙根断面有少量残屑、玷污层,并有牙本质小管开放;高速涡轮金刚砂车针切除组牙根断面有大量残屑及玷污层,没有牙本质小管开放。高速涡轮金刚砂车针切除组中能看到大量裂隙出现,超声金刚砂尖切除组中可见裂隙出现,而Er:YAG激光切除组中几乎没有裂隙出现。高速涡轮金刚砂车针切除组和超声金刚砂尖切除组牙根断面的表面粗糙并有明显切割痕迹,而Er:YAG激光切除组牙根表面没有切割痕迹,较为平滑。结论Er:YAG激光应用于根尖切除具有一定的优势,其牙根断面组织形态学方面的表现明显优于超声金刚砂尖和高速涡轮金刚砂车针。

关键词: Er:YAG激光, 根尖切除, 扫描电镜

Abstract:

Objective To compare the difference of the surface of root resection by Er:YAG laser, ultrasonic or high-speed handpiece with scanning electron microscope(SEM), and to evaluate the possibility of using Er:YAG laser on the root resection in clinical application. Methods Thirty maxillary central incisors were divided into three groups(Er:YAG laser group, ultrasonic group, high-speed handpiece group), and the root resection were made at root tip 3 mm with Er:YAG laser, ultrasonic instrument or long needle diamond bur according to grouping. The surface of the root resection by SEM in the aspects of debris, smear layer, opened dentinal tubules, cracks and ablation characteristics were compared. Results The examination revealed that Er:YAG laser group and ultrasonic group had no or little debris and smear layer and with opened dentinal tubules. High-speed handpiece group had great amount of debris and smear layer and without opened dentinal tubules. Cracks were observed in ultrasonic group and highspeed handpiece group, no in Er:YAG laser group. There were ablation characteristics in ultrasonic group and highspeed handpiece group, but no in Er:YAG laser group. Conclusion From the morphological aspect, Er:YAG laser has much more advantage than ultrasonic instrument and diamond bur for the root resection.

Key words: Er:YAG laser, root resection, scanning electron microscope